Is Explanation the Cure? Misinformation Mitigation in the Short Term and Long Term
This addresses misinformation mitigation for social media users, but it is incremental as it evaluates existing methods rather than introducing new ones.
The study compared warning labels and GPT-4-generated counterfactual explanations for mitigating misinformation, finding both interventions significantly reduced participants' belief in fake claims equally in short-term and long-term tests.
With advancements in natural language processing (NLP) models, automatic explanation generation has been proposed to mitigate misinformation on social media platforms in addition to adding warning labels to identified fake news. While many researchers have focused on generating good explanations, how these explanations can really help humans combat fake news is under-explored. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of a warning label and the state-of-the-art counterfactual explanations generated by GPT-4 in debunking misinformation. In a two-wave, online human-subject study, participants (N = 215) were randomly assigned to a control group in which false contents are shown without any intervention, a warning tag group in which the false claims were labeled, or an explanation group in which the false contents were accompanied by GPT-4 generated explanations. Our results show that both interventions significantly decrease participants' self-reported belief in fake claims in an equivalent manner for the short-term and long-term. We discuss the implications of our findings and directions for future NLP-based misinformation debunking strategies.