AISYNov 16, 2023

A Systems-Theoretical Formalization of Closed Systems

arXiv:2311.10786v15 citationsh-index: 18
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses foundational gaps in systems engineering for intelligent systems, though it appears incremental as it builds on previous proposals without presenting new empirical results or benchmarks.

The paper tackles the lack of formalism for closed systems in systems engineering, particularly for intelligent systems, by providing formal definitions and a mathematical framework to evaluate system boundaries and constraints.

There is a lack of formalism for some key foundational concepts in systems engineering. One of the most recently acknowledged deficits is the inadequacy of systems engineering practices for engineering intelligent systems. In our previous works, we proposed that closed systems precepts could be used to accomplish a required paradigm shift for the systems engineering of intelligent systems. However, to enable such a shift, formal foundations for closed systems precepts that expand the theory of systems engineering are needed. The concept of closure is a critical concept in the formalism underlying closed systems precepts. In this paper, we provide formal, systems- and information-theoretic definitions of closure to identify and distinguish different types of closed systems. Then, we assert a mathematical framework to evaluate the subjective formation of the boundaries and constraints of such systems. Finally, we argue that engineering an intelligent system can benefit from appropriate closed and open systems paradigms on multiple levels of abstraction of the system. In the main, this framework will provide the necessary fundamentals to aid in systems engineering of intelligent systems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes