CVNov 29, 2023

LiDAR-based Outdoor Crowd Management for Smart Campus on the Edge

arXiv:2311.18077v12 citationsh-index: 1
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses privacy and illumination issues in crowd management for smart campuses, though it is incremental as it applies known methods to a new sensor type.

The paper tackled outdoor crowd management on a smart campus by using LiDAR sensors and edge computing to count people on walkways, achieving accuracies of 85.4% with a non-CNN method and 95.8% with a CNN-based method, with the latter significantly outperforming existing solutions.

Crowd management is crucial for a smart campus. Popular methods are camera-based. However, conventional camera-based approaches may leak users' personally identifiable features, jeopardizing user's privacy, which limits its application. In this work, we investigate using affordable light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology to perform outdoor crowd management leveraging edge computing. Specifically, we aim to count the number of people on a walkway of a university campus. Besides privacy protection, LiDAR sensors are superior to cameras since their performance will not be compromised when the campus is not well-illuminated. We deploy LiDAR sensors on light poles to collect data from the crowd on the campus and leverage edge accelerators to process data locally. We proposed two different methodologies in this work: 1) a non-convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach, using clustering and autoencoder, and 2) a CNN-based approach that first projects point clouds to 2D planes and then processes the projection with conventional CNNs. Our first approach relies on careful feature engineering, whereas our second approach does not require such effort. However, the CNN-based approach requires more computational power than our non-CNN-based approach. We evaluate both approaches comprehensively with our hand-labeled real-life data collected from campus. Our evaluation results show that the first method achieves an accuracy of 85.4%, whereas the second method achieves 95.8%. Our CNN-based method outperforms existing solutions significantly. We also deploy our two models on an edge accelerator, TPU, to measure the speedup, leveraging this specialized accelerator.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes