AICLDec 6, 2023

Can language agents be alternatives to PPO? A Preliminary Empirical Study On OpenAI Gym

arXiv:2312.03290v11 citationsh-index: 13Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the potential for language agents to serve as alternatives to traditional RL methods like PPO in decision-making problems, though it is preliminary and incremental.

The study investigates whether language agents can replace PPO agents in sequential decision-making tasks using OpenAI Gym environments, finding that they show competitive performance with insights into their capabilities.

The formidable capacity for zero- or few-shot decision-making in language agents encourages us to pose a compelling question: Can language agents be alternatives to PPO agents in traditional sequential decision-making tasks? To investigate this, we first take environments collected in OpenAI Gym as our testbeds and ground them to textual environments that construct the TextGym simulator. This allows for straightforward and efficient comparisons between PPO agents and language agents, given the widespread adoption of OpenAI Gym. To ensure a fair and effective benchmarking, we introduce $5$ levels of scenario for accurate domain-knowledge controlling and a unified RL-inspired framework for language agents. Additionally, we propose an innovative explore-exploit-guided language (EXE) agent to solve tasks within TextGym. Through numerical experiments and ablation studies, we extract valuable insights into the decision-making capabilities of language agents and make a preliminary evaluation of their potential to be alternatives to PPO in classical sequential decision-making problems. This paper sheds light on the performance of language agents and paves the way for future research in this exciting domain. Our code is publicly available at~\url{https://github.com/mail-ecnu/Text-Gym-Agents}.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes