Distribution Matching for Multi-Task Learning of Classification Tasks: a Large-Scale Study on Faces & Beyond
This addresses the problem of annotation scarcity in real-world applications for researchers and practitioners in multi-task learning, offering a novel solution that is not incremental.
The paper tackles the challenge of multi-task learning with non-overlapping or imbalanced annotations across tasks, proposing a distribution matching approach to enable knowledge exchange. The method achieves large performance improvements over state-of-the-art in affective computing tasks and prevents negative transfer across nine diverse datasets.
Multi-Task Learning (MTL) is a framework, where multiple related tasks are learned jointly and benefit from a shared representation space, or parameter transfer. To provide sufficient learning support, modern MTL uses annotated data with full, or sufficiently large overlap across tasks, i.e., each input sample is annotated for all, or most of the tasks. However, collecting such annotations is prohibitive in many real applications, and cannot benefit from datasets available for individual tasks. In this work, we challenge this setup and show that MTL can be successful with classification tasks with little, or non-overlapping annotations, or when there is big discrepancy in the size of labeled data per task. We explore task-relatedness for co-annotation and co-training, and propose a novel approach, where knowledge exchange is enabled between the tasks via distribution matching. To demonstrate the general applicability of our method, we conducted diverse case studies in the domains of affective computing, face recognition, species recognition, and shopping item classification using nine datasets. Our large-scale study of affective tasks for basic expression recognition and facial action unit detection illustrates that our approach is network agnostic and brings large performance improvements compared to the state-of-the-art in both tasks and across all studied databases. In all case studies, we show that co-training via task-relatedness is advantageous and prevents negative transfer (which occurs when MT model's performance is worse than that of at least one single-task model).