Immature Green Apple Detection and Sizing in Commercial Orchards using YOLOv8 and Shape Fitting Techniques
It addresses labor-intensive fruit size measurement for orchard management, but is incremental as it applies existing methods to a specific agricultural task.
This study tackled the problem of detecting and sizing immature green apples in commercial orchards by using YOLOv8 instance segmentation and shape fitting on 3D point cloud data, achieving high accuracy with AP scores up to 0.94 and RMSE as low as 2.35 mm for size estimation.
Detecting and estimating size of apples during the early stages of growth is crucial for predicting yield, pest management, and making informed decisions related to crop-load management, harvest and post-harvest logistics, and marketing. Traditional fruit size measurement methods are laborious and timeconsuming. This study employs the state-of-the-art YOLOv8 object detection and instance segmentation algorithm in conjunction with geometric shape fitting techniques on 3D point cloud data to accurately determine the size of immature green apples (or fruitlet) in a commercial orchard environment. The methodology utilized two RGB-D sensors: Intel RealSense D435i and Microsoft Azure Kinect DK. Notably, the YOLOv8 instance segmentation models exhibited proficiency in immature green apple detection, with the YOLOv8m-seg model achieving the highest AP@0.5 and AP@0.75 scores of 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. Using the ellipsoid fitting technique on images from the Azure Kinect, we achieved an RMSE of 2.35 mm, MAE of 1.66 mm, MAPE of 6.15 mm, and an R-squared value of 0.9 in estimating the size of apple fruitlets. Challenges such as partial occlusion caused some error in accurately delineating and sizing green apples using the YOLOv8-based segmentation technique, particularly in fruit clusters. In a comparison with 102 outdoor samples, the size estimation technique performed better on the images acquired with Microsoft Azure Kinect than the same with Intel Realsense D435i. This superiority is evident from the metrics: the RMSE values (2.35 mm for Azure Kinect vs. 9.65 mm for Realsense D435i), MAE values (1.66 mm for Azure Kinect vs. 7.8 mm for Realsense D435i), and the R-squared values (0.9 for Azure Kinect vs. 0.77 for Realsense D435i).