CVJan 24, 2024

Privacy-Preserving Face Recognition in Hybrid Frequency-Color Domain

arXiv:2401.13386v19 citationsVISIGRAPP : VISAPP
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses privacy concerns for users of face recognition systems by reducing accuracy degradation, though it is incremental as it builds on existing privacy-preserving techniques.

The paper tackles the problem of privacy-preserving face recognition by proposing a hybrid frequency-color fusion approach and identity-specific embedding mapping, achieving 2.6% to 4.2% higher accuracy than state-of-the-art methods in 1:N verification scenarios.

Face recognition technology has been deployed in various real-life applications. The most sophisticated deep learning-based face recognition systems rely on training millions of face images through complex deep neural networks to achieve high accuracy. It is quite common for clients to upload face images to the service provider in order to access the model inference. However, the face image is a type of sensitive biometric attribute tied to the identity information of each user. Directly exposing the raw face image to the service provider poses a threat to the user's privacy. Current privacy-preserving approaches to face recognition focus on either concealing visual information on model input or protecting model output face embedding. The noticeable drop in recognition accuracy is a pitfall for most methods. This paper proposes a hybrid frequency-color fusion approach to reduce the input dimensionality of face recognition in the frequency domain. Moreover, sparse color information is also introduced to alleviate significant accuracy degradation after adding differential privacy noise. Besides, an identity-specific embedding mapping scheme is applied to protect original face embedding by enlarging the distance among identities. Lastly, secure multiparty computation is implemented for safely computing the embedding distance during model inference. The proposed method performs well on multiple widely used verification datasets. Moreover, it has around 2.6% to 4.2% higher accuracy than the state-of-the-art in the 1:N verification scenario.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes