LGNAFeb 1, 2024

Preconditioning for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv:2402.00531v110 citationsh-index: 18
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses convergence issues in PINNs for solving PDEs, which is incremental as it applies classical preconditioning to a known bottleneck in an existing method.

The paper tackles training pathologies in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that limit convergence and accuracy, proposing to use condition number as a diagnostic and mitigation metric, with evaluations on 18 PDE problems showing error reductions by an order of magnitude in 7 cases.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown promise in solving various partial differential equations (PDEs). However, training pathologies have negatively affected the convergence and prediction accuracy of PINNs, which further limits their practical applications. In this paper, we propose to use condition number as a metric to diagnose and mitigate the pathologies in PINNs. Inspired by classical numerical analysis, where the condition number measures sensitivity and stability, we highlight its pivotal role in the training dynamics of PINNs. We prove theorems to reveal how condition number is related to both the error control and convergence of PINNs. Subsequently, we present an algorithm that leverages preconditioning to improve the condition number. Evaluations of 18 PDE problems showcase the superior performance of our method. Significantly, in 7 of these problems, our method reduces errors by an order of magnitude. These empirical findings verify the critical role of the condition number in PINNs' training.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes