CLAICVFeb 2, 2024

Describing Images $\textit{Fast and Slow}$: Quantifying and Predicting the Variation in Human Signals during Visuo-Linguistic Processes

arXiv:2402.01352v1103 citationsh-index: 12EACL
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of understanding visuo-linguistic variation for improving AI models, but it is incremental as it builds on existing datasets and methods.

The study investigated the relationship between image properties and human behavior during image description, finding correlations between eye movements and description timing, and showed that pretrained vision encoders only weakly capture this variation, indicating a lack of bias about human perceptual complexity.

There is an intricate relation between the properties of an image and how humans behave while describing the image. This behavior shows ample variation, as manifested in human signals such as eye movements and when humans start to describe the image. Despite the value of such signals of visuo-linguistic variation, they are virtually disregarded in the training of current pretrained models, which motivates further investigation. Using a corpus of Dutch image descriptions with concurrently collected eye-tracking data, we explore the nature of the variation in visuo-linguistic signals, and find that they correlate with each other. Given this result, we hypothesize that variation stems partly from the properties of the images, and explore whether image representations encoded by pretrained vision encoders can capture such variation. Our results indicate that pretrained models do so to a weak-to-moderate degree, suggesting that the models lack biases about what makes a stimulus complex for humans and what leads to variations in human outputs.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes