DCCRLGFeb 15, 2024

DPBalance: Efficient and Fair Privacy Budget Scheduling for Federated Learning as a Service

arXiv:2402.09715v19 citationsh-index: 13INFOCOM
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for fair and efficient privacy budget allocation for data analysts in FLaaS, though it is incremental as it builds on prior work focusing on either efficiency or fairness individually.

The paper tackles the problem of scheduling privacy budgets in Federated Learning as a Service to balance efficiency and fairness, achieving average improvements of 1.44× to 3.49× in efficiency and 1.37× to 24.32× in fairness compared to existing methods.

Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a prevalent distributed machine learning scheme that enables collaborative model training without aggregating raw data. Cloud service providers further embrace Federated Learning as a Service (FLaaS), allowing data analysts to execute their FL training pipelines over differentially-protected data. Due to the intrinsic properties of differential privacy, the enforced privacy level on data blocks can be viewed as a privacy budget that requires careful scheduling to cater to diverse training pipelines. Existing privacy budget scheduling studies prioritize either efficiency or fairness individually. In this paper, we propose DPBalance, a novel privacy budget scheduling mechanism that jointly optimizes both efficiency and fairness. We first develop a comprehensive utility function incorporating data analyst-level dominant shares and FL-specific performance metrics. A sequential allocation mechanism is then designed using the Lagrange multiplier method and effective greedy heuristics. We theoretically prove that DPBalance satisfies Pareto Efficiency, Sharing Incentive, Envy-Freeness, and Weak Strategy Proofness. We also theoretically prove the existence of a fairness-efficiency tradeoff in privacy budgeting. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DPBalance outperforms state-of-the-art solutions, achieving an average efficiency improvement of $1.44\times \sim 3.49 \times$, and an average fairness improvement of $1.37\times \sim 24.32 \times$.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes