An Empirical Evaluation of Neural and Neuro-symbolic Approaches to Real-time Multimodal Complex Event Detection
It addresses the challenge of improving temporal reasoning for robots and autonomous systems in complex event detection, representing an incremental advance by evaluating existing methods on a specific task.
This study tackled the problem of complex event detection from multimodal sensor data by comparing neural and neuro-symbolic approaches, finding that the neuro-symbolic architecture significantly outperformed purely neural models in recognition performance.
Robots and autonomous systems require an understanding of complex events (CEs) from sensor data to interact with their environments and humans effectively. Traditional end-to-end neural architectures, despite processing sensor data efficiently, struggle with long-duration events due to limited context sizes and reasoning capabilities. Recent advances in neuro-symbolic methods, which integrate neural and symbolic models leveraging human knowledge, promise improved performance with less data. This study addresses the gap in understanding these approaches' effectiveness in complex event detection (CED), especially in temporal reasoning. We investigate neural and neuro-symbolic architectures' performance in a multimodal CED task, analyzing IMU and acoustic data streams to recognize CE patterns. Our methodology includes (i) end-to-end neural architectures for direct CE detection from sensor embeddings, (ii) two-stage concept-based neural models mapping sensor embeddings to atomic events (AEs) before CE detection, and (iii) a neuro-symbolic approach using a symbolic finite-state machine for CE detection from AEs. Empirically, the neuro-symbolic architecture significantly surpasses purely neural models, demonstrating superior performance in CE recognition, even with extensive training data and ample temporal context for neural approaches.