AISYFeb 25, 2024

PIDformer: Transformer Meets Control Theory

arXiv:2402.15989v113 citationsh-index: 12ICML
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses robustness and representation issues in transformers for AI/ML practitioners, though it is an incremental improvement by combining control theory with existing architectures.

The paper tackles input corruption and rank collapse in transformers by integrating a PID control system into the self-attention mechanism, resulting in improved robustness and representation capacity across tasks like object classification, image segmentation, and language modeling.

In this work, we address two main shortcomings of transformer architectures: input corruption and rank collapse in their output representation. We unveil self-attention as an autonomous state-space model that inherently promotes smoothness in its solutions, leading to lower-rank outputs and diminished representation capacity. Moreover, the steady-state solution of the model is sensitive to input perturbations. We incorporate a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) closed-loop feedback control system with a reference point into the model to improve robustness and representation capacity. This integration aims to preserve high-frequency details while bolstering model stability, rendering it more noise-resilient. The resulting controlled state-space model is theoretically proven robust and adept at addressing the rank collapse. Motivated by this control framework, we derive a novel class of transformers, PID-controlled Transformer (PIDformer), aimed at improving robustness and mitigating the rank-collapse issue inherent in softmax transformers. We empirically evaluate the model for advantages and robustness against baseline transformers across various practical tasks, including object classification, image segmentation, and language modeling.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes