CLAILGFeb 27, 2024

Deep Learning Detection Method for Large Language Models-Generated Scientific Content

arXiv:2403.00828v127 citationsh-index: 9Neural computing & applications (Print)
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the issue of LLM-generated content undermining reliability in the scientific community, though it is incremental as it builds on existing detection techniques.

The paper tackles the problem of detecting ChatGPT-generated scientific text to ensure publication integrity, presenting AI-Catcher, a deep learning method that combines MLP and CNN models, which improved detection accuracy by 37.4% on average compared to alternative methods.

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3 and BERT, reshape how textual content is written and communicated. These models have the potential to generate scientific content that is indistinguishable from that written by humans. Hence, LLMs carry severe consequences for the scientific community, which relies on the integrity and reliability of publications. This research paper presents a novel ChatGPT-generated scientific text detection method, AI-Catcher. AI-Catcher integrates two deep learning models, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The MLP learns the feature representations of the linguistic and statistical features. The CNN extracts high-level representations of the sequential patterns from the textual content. AI-Catcher is a multimodal model that fuses hidden patterns derived from MLP and CNN. In addition, a new ChatGPT-Generated scientific text dataset is collected to enhance AI-generated text detection tools, AIGTxt. AIGTxt contains 3000 records collected from published academic articles across ten domains and divided into three classes: Human-written, ChatGPT-generated, and Mixed text. Several experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of AI-Catcher. The comparative results demonstrate the capability of AI-Catcher to distinguish between human-written and ChatGPT-generated scientific text more accurately than alternative methods. On average, AI-Catcher improved accuracy by 37.4%.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes