CLAILGMar 5, 2024

MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv:2403.02884v1169 citationsh-index: 9Has CodeICML
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for better mathematical problem-solving in AI, particularly for educational and benchmarking applications, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods for data generation.

The authors tackled the problem of inadequate mathematical reasoning in large language models by proposing MathScale, a scalable method to generate high-quality math question-answer pairs, resulting in a 2M dataset and fine-tuned models that achieve state-of-the-art performance with 42.9% and 43.7% accuracy gains over peers.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in problem-solving. However, their proficiency in solving mathematical problems remains inadequate. We propose MathScale, a simple and scalable method to create high-quality mathematical reasoning data using frontier LLMs (e.g., {\tt GPT-3.5}). Inspired by the cognitive mechanism in human mathematical learning, it first extracts topics and knowledge points from seed math questions and then build a concept graph, which is subsequently used to generate new math questions. MathScale exhibits effective scalability along the size axis of the math dataset that we generate. As a result, we create a mathematical reasoning dataset (MathScaleQA) containing two million math question-answer pairs. To evaluate mathematical reasoning abilities of LLMs comprehensively, we construct {\sc MwpBench}, a benchmark of Math Word Problems, which is a collection of ten datasets (including GSM8K and MATH) covering K-12, college, and competition level math problems. We apply MathScaleQA to fine-tune open-source LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-2 and Mistral), resulting in significantly improved capabilities in mathematical reasoning. Evaluated on {\sc MwpBench}, MathScale-7B achieves state-of-the-art performance across all datasets, surpassing its best peers of equivalent size by 42.9\% in micro average accuracy and 43.7\% in macro average accuracy, respectively.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes