From Instructions to Constraints: Language Model Alignment with Automatic Constraint Verification
This addresses the challenge of adapting language models to customized constraints in downstream tasks without extensive human input, though it is incremental as it builds on existing alignment methods.
The paper tackles the problem of aligning language models to user instructions with constraints when human annotations are scarce, by proposing ACT, a framework that uses automatic constraint verification to generate supervision signals, resulting in improved task performance on entity typing, summarization, and question answering.
User alignment is crucial for adapting general-purpose language models (LMs) to downstream tasks, but human annotations are often not available for all types of instructions, especially those with customized constraints. We observe that user instructions typically contain constraints. While assessing response quality in terms of the whole instruction is often costly, efficiently evaluating the satisfaction rate of constraints is feasible. We investigate common constraints in NLP tasks, categorize them into three classes based on the types of their arguments, and propose a unified framework, ACT (Aligning to ConsTraints), to automatically produce supervision signals for user alignment with constraints. Specifically, ACT uses constraint verifiers, which are typically easy to implement in practice, to compute constraint satisfaction rate (CSR) of each response. It samples multiple responses for each prompt and collect preference labels based on their CSR automatically. Subsequently, ACT adapts the LM to the target task through a ranking-based learning process. Experiments on fine-grained entity typing, abstractive summarization, and temporal question answering show that ACT is able to enhance LMs' capability to adhere to different classes of constraints, thereby improving task performance. Further experiments show that the constraint-following capabilities are transferable.