CVCLLGMar 20, 2024

Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Grounding

Cambridge
arXiv:2403.14003v1214 citationsh-index: 28CVPR
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a critical reliability issue for users of VLMs in applications like captioning and VQA, though it is an incremental improvement over existing methods.

The paper tackles the problem of hallucination in generative Vision-Language Models, where models generate plausible but ungrounded text, by introducing Multi-Modal Mutual-Information Decoding (M3ID) to amplify visual influence, reducing hallucinated objects by 25-28% and improving VQA accuracy by 21-24%.

Generative Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are prone to generate plausible-sounding textual answers that, however, are not always grounded in the input image. We investigate this phenomenon, usually referred to as "hallucination" and show that it stems from an excessive reliance on the language prior. In particular, we show that as more tokens are generated, the reliance on the visual prompt decreases, and this behavior strongly correlates with the emergence of hallucinations. To reduce hallucinations, we introduce Multi-Modal Mutual-Information Decoding (M3ID), a new sampling method for prompt amplification. M3ID amplifies the influence of the reference image over the language prior, hence favoring the generation of tokens with higher mutual information with the visual prompt. M3ID can be applied to any pre-trained autoregressive VLM at inference time without necessitating further training and with minimal computational overhead. If training is an option, we show that M3ID can be paired with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to improve the model's reliance on the prompt image without requiring any labels. Our empirical findings show that our algorithms maintain the fluency and linguistic capabilities of pre-trained VLMs while reducing hallucinations by mitigating visually ungrounded answers. Specifically, for the LLaVA 13B model, M3ID and M3ID+DPO reduce the percentage of hallucinated objects in captioning tasks by 25% and 28%, respectively, and improve the accuracy on VQA benchmarks such as POPE by 21% and 24%.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes