CYAIMar 24, 2024

The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Vision for Hybrid Intelligence

arXiv:2403.16081v4171 citationsh-index: 34Br J Educ Technol
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

It addresses the conceptual gap in AI for education, aiming to enhance learning systems and human cognition, but is incremental as it builds on existing AIED frameworks.

This paper critiques the narrow view of AI as tools in education and proposes three conceptualizations of AI—externalization of human cognition, internalization of AI models, and extension via hybrid systems—to foster human-AI hybrid intelligence, advocating for a broader approach in AI in Education research.

This paper presents a multi-dimensional view of AI's role in learning and education, emphasizing the intricate interplay between AI, analytics, and the learning processes. Here, I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualisation of AI as tools, as exemplified in generative AI tools, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI for achieving human-AI hybrid intelligence. I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, the importance of hybrid human-AI systems to extend human cognition, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. Early learning sciences and AI in Education research (AIED), which saw AI as an analogy for human intelligence, have diverged from this perspective, prompting a need to rekindle this connection. The paper presents three unique conceptualisations of AI: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human mental models, and the extension of human cognition via tightly coupled human-AI hybrid intelligence systems. Examples from current research and practice are examined as instances of the three conceptualisations in education, highlighting the potential value and limitations of each conceptualisation for education, as well as the perils of overemphasis on externalising human cognition. The paper concludes with advocacy for a broader approach to AIED that goes beyond considerations on the design and development of AI, but also includes educating people about AI and innovating educational systems to remain relevant in an AI-ubiquitous world.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes