CLAIMar 28, 2024

MATEval: A Multi-Agent Discussion Framework for Advancing Open-Ended Text Evaluation

arXiv:2403.19305v221 citationsh-index: 11DASFAA
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of uncertainty and instability in text evaluation for researchers and practitioners in natural language processing, offering an incremental improvement over single-agent LLM evaluators.

The paper tackles the challenge of evaluating open-ended text generated by large language models by proposing MATEval, a multi-agent discussion framework using LLMs like GPT-4, which outperforms existing methods and achieves the highest correlation with human evaluation.

Recent advancements in generative Large Language Models(LLMs) have been remarkable, however, the quality of the text generated by these models often reveals persistent issues. Evaluating the quality of text generated by these models, especially in open-ended text, has consistently presented a significant challenge. Addressing this, recent work has explored the possibility of using LLMs as evaluators. While using a single LLM as an evaluation agent shows potential, it is filled with significant uncertainty and instability. To address these issues, we propose the MATEval: A "Multi-Agent Text Evaluation framework" where all agents are played by LLMs like GPT-4. The MATEval framework emulates human collaborative discussion methods, integrating multiple agents' interactions to evaluate open-ended text. Our framework incorporates self-reflection and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) strategies, along with feedback mechanisms, enhancing the depth and breadth of the evaluation process and guiding discussions towards consensus, while the framework generates comprehensive evaluation reports, including error localization, error types and scoring. Experimental results show that our framework outperforms existing open-ended text evaluation methods and achieves the highest correlation with human evaluation, which confirms the effectiveness and advancement of our framework in addressing the uncertainties and instabilities in evaluating LLMs-generated text. Furthermore, our framework significantly improves the efficiency of text evaluation and model iteration in industrial scenarios.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes