Bounds of Block Rewards in Honest PinFi Systems
This addresses protocol stability issues for decentralized pricing systems, but it is incremental as it builds on existing PinFi frameworks.
The study tackled stability and sustainability challenges in PinFi protocols by analyzing liquidity provider behavior using game theory, finding that a calibrated range of block rewards can maintain dynamic equilibrium among participants under common conditions.
PinFi is a class of novel protocols for decentralized pricing of dissipative assets, whose value naturally declines over time. Central to the protocol's functionality and its market efficiency is the role of liquidity providers (LPs). This study addresses critical stability and sustainability challenges within the protocol, namely: the propensity of LPs to prefer selling in external markets over participation in the protocol; a similar inclination towards selling within the PinFi system rather than contributing as LPs; and a scenario where LPs are disinclined to sell within the protocol. Employing a game-theoretic approach, we explore PinFi's mechanisms and its broader ramifications. Our findings reveal that, under a variety of common conditions and with an assumption of participant integrity, PinFi is capable of fostering a dynamic equilibrium among LPs, sellers, and buyers. This balance is maintained through a carefully calibrated range of block rewards for LPs, ensuring the protocol's long-term stability and utility.