AICYLGApr 17, 2024

Taxonomy to Regulation: A (Geo)Political Taxonomy for AI Risks and Regulatory Measures in the EU AI Act

arXiv:2404.11476v16 citationsh-index: 1Has Code
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

It addresses AI risk regulation for policymakers in the EU, but is incremental as it builds on existing regulatory frameworks.

This work proposes a taxonomy of 12 geopolitical risks associated with AI, divided into four categories, and assesses the EU AI Act, finding it has potential for positive impact but needs adjustments to address gaps such as exceptions for open-source models and military systems.

Technological innovations have shown remarkable capabilities to benefit and harm society alike. AI constitutes a democratized sophisticated technology accessible to large parts of society, including malicious actors. This work proposes a taxonomy focusing on on (geo)political risks associated with AI. It identifies 12 risks in total divided into four categories: (1) Geopolitical Pressures, (2) Malicious Usage, (3) Environmental, Social, and Ethical Risks, and (4) Privacy and Trust Violations. Incorporating a regulatory side, this paper conducts a policy assessment of the EU AI Act. Adopted in March 2023, the landmark regulation has the potential to have a positive top-down impact concerning AI risk reduction but needs regulatory adjustments to mitigate risks more comprehensively. Regulatory exceptions for open-source models, excessively high parameters for the classification of GPAI models as a systemic risk, and the exclusion of systems designed exclusively for military purposes from the regulation's obligations leave room for future action.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes