CLAIApr 23, 2024

LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models

Amazon
arXiv:2404.15522v281 citationsh-index: 30Has CodeACL
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the underexplored area of logical reasoning in LLMs, providing a benchmark for future research, though it is incremental as it builds on existing evaluation efforts.

The paper tackles the problem of evaluating the logical reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) by introducing LogicBench, a dataset for systematic assessment across 25 reasoning patterns, and finds that existing LLMs perform poorly, especially with complex reasoning and negations.

Recently developed large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of language understanding tasks. But, can they really "reason" over the natural language? This question has been receiving significant research attention and many reasoning skills such as commonsense, numerical, and qualitative have been studied. However, the crucial skill pertaining to 'logical reasoning' has remained underexplored. Existing work investigating this reasoning ability of LLMs has focused only on a couple of inference rules (such as modus ponens and modus tollens) of propositional and first-order logic. Addressing the above limitation, we comprehensively evaluate the logical reasoning ability of LLMs on 25 different reasoning patterns spanning over propositional, first-order, and non-monotonic logics. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce LogicBench, a natural language question-answering dataset focusing on the use of a single inference rule. We conduct detailed analysis with a range of LLMs such as GPT-4, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama-2, and Mistral using chain-of-thought prompting. Experimental results show that existing LLMs do not fare well on LogicBench; especially, they struggle with instances involving complex reasoning and negations. Furthermore, they sometimes overlook contextual information necessary for reasoning to arrive at the correct conclusion. We believe that our work and findings facilitate future research for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning ability of LLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Mihir3009/LogicBench.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes