Unpaired Multi-view Clustering via Reliable View Guidance
This addresses the problem of clustering with unpaired multi-view data for researchers in machine learning, offering a novel approach to handle uncertain cluster structures and pairing relationships.
The paper tackles unpaired multi-view clustering (UMC) by introducing reliable view guidance to extract consistent cluster structures across views without paired samples, achieving average NMI improvements of 24.14% and 29.42% over the best state-of-the-art method.
This paper focuses on unpaired multi-view clustering (UMC), a challenging problem where paired observed samples are unavailable across multiple views. The goal is to perform effective joint clustering using the unpaired observed samples in all views. In incomplete multi-view clustering, existing methods typically rely on sample pairing between views to capture their complementary. However, that is not applicable in the case of UMC. Hence, we aim to extract the consistent cluster structure across views. In UMC, two challenging issues arise: uncertain cluster structure due to lack of label and uncertain pairing relationship due to absence of paired samples. We assume that the view with a good cluster structure is the reliable view, which acts as a supervisor to guide the clustering of the other views. With the guidance of reliable views, a more certain cluster structure of these views is obtained while achieving alignment between reliable views and other views. Then we propose Reliable view Guidance with one reliable view (RG-UMC) and multiple reliable views (RGs-UMC) for UMC. Specifically, we design alignment modules with one reliable view and multiple reliable views, respectively, to adaptively guide the optimization process. Also, we utilize the compactness module to enhance the relationship of samples within the same cluster. Meanwhile, an orthogonal constraint is applied to latent representation to obtain discriminate features. Extensive experiments show that both RG-UMC and RGs-UMC outperform the best state-of-the-art method by an average of 24.14\% and 29.42\% in NMI, respectively.