Comparative Analysis of Retrieval Systems in the Real World
It addresses the need for robust question-answering systems across various domains, but it is incremental as it focuses on comparative analysis of existing and hybrid methods.
This paper compares multiple state-of-the-art retrieval systems, including Azure Cognitive Search with GPT-4 and novel KG-FID Retrieval, using the RobustQA metric to evaluate their accuracy and efficiency in handling paraphrased questions.
This research paper presents a comprehensive analysis of integrating advanced language models with search and retrieval systems in the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing. The objective is to evaluate and compare various state-of-the-art methods based on their performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The analysis explores different combinations of technologies, including Azure Cognitive Search Retriever with GPT-4, Pinecone's Canopy framework, Langchain with Pinecone and different language models (OpenAI, Cohere), LlamaIndex with Weaviate Vector Store's hybrid search, Google's RAG implementation on Cloud VertexAI-Search, Amazon SageMaker's RAG, and a novel approach called KG-FID Retrieval. The motivation for this analysis arises from the increasing demand for robust and responsive question-answering systems in various domains. The RobustQA metric is used to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions. The report aims to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, facilitating informed decisions in the deployment and development of AI-driven search and retrieval systems.