Explainable Malware Detection with Tailored Logic Explained Networks
This addresses the need for explainable AI in cybersecurity, where understanding model decisions is crucial for trust and compliance, though it is incremental as it extends an existing method to a new domain.
The paper tackled the problem of malware detection by applying Logic Explained Networks (LENs) to the EMBER dataset, achieving robustness that exceeds traditional interpretable methods and rivals black-box models, with a tailored version generating logic explanations with higher fidelity.
Malware detection is a constant challenge in cybersecurity due to the rapid development of new attack techniques. Traditional signature-based approaches struggle to keep pace with the sheer volume of malware samples. Machine learning offers a promising solution, but faces issues of generalization to unseen samples and a lack of explanation for the instances identified as malware. However, human-understandable explanations are especially important in security-critical fields, where understanding model decisions is crucial for trust and legal compliance. While deep learning models excel at malware detection, their black-box nature hinders explainability. Conversely, interpretable models often fall short in performance. To bridge this gap in this application domain, we propose the use of Logic Explained Networks (LENs), which are a recently proposed class of interpretable neural networks providing explanations in the form of First-Order Logic (FOL) rules. This paper extends the application of LENs to the complex domain of malware detection, specifically using the large-scale EMBER dataset. In the experimental results we show that LENs achieve robustness that exceeds traditional interpretable methods and that are rivaling black-box models. Moreover, we introduce a tailored version of LENs that is shown to generate logic explanations with higher fidelity with respect to the model's predictions.