Words Worth a Thousand Pictures: Measuring and Understanding Perceptual Variability in Text-to-Image Generation
This work addresses the understudied issue of perceptual variability for users of text-to-image models, providing tools to quantify and analyze prompt effects, though it is incremental in building on existing perceptual distances.
The paper tackles the problem of measuring perceptual variability in text-to-image diffusion models by introducing W1KP, a human-calibrated metric that outperforms baselines by up to 18 points in accuracy and matches human judgments 78% of the time, and uses it to show that prompts can be reused 10-200 times depending on the model before images become too similar.
Diffusion models are the state of the art in text-to-image generation, but their perceptual variability remains understudied. In this paper, we examine how prompts affect image variability in black-box diffusion-based models. We propose W1KP, a human-calibrated measure of variability in a set of images, bootstrapped from existing image-pair perceptual distances. Current datasets do not cover recent diffusion models, thus we curate three test sets for evaluation. Our best perceptual distance outperforms nine baselines by up to 18 points in accuracy, and our calibration matches graded human judgements 78% of the time. Using W1KP, we study prompt reusability and show that Imagen prompts can be reused for 10-50 random seeds before new images become too similar to already generated images, while Stable Diffusion XL and DALL-E 3 can be reused 50-200 times. Lastly, we analyze 56 linguistic features of real prompts, finding that the prompt's length, CLIP embedding norm, concreteness, and word senses influence variability most. As far as we are aware, we are the first to analyze diffusion variability from a visuolinguistic perspective. Our project page is at http://w1kp.com.