Comparative Analysis Of Color Models For Human Perception And Visual Color Difference
This work addresses the issue of inaccurate color difference assessment in image processing for applications like digital design and quality control, but it is incremental as it compares existing models without introducing new methods.
This paper tackled the problem of color models not aligning well with human visual perception by comparing RGB, HSV, HSL, XYZ, CIELAB, and CIELUV for their effectiveness in representing color differences and palette extraction, finding that some models better match human perception than others.
Color is integral to human experience, influencing emotions, decisions, and perceptions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of various color models' alignment with human visual perception. The study evaluates color models such as RGB, HSV, HSL, XYZ, CIELAB, and CIELUV to assess their effectiveness in accurately representing how humans perceive color. We evaluate each model based on its ability to accurately reflect visual color differences and dominant palette extraction compatible with the human eye. In image processing, accurate assessment of color difference is essential for applications ranging from digital design to quality control. Current color difference metrics do not always match how people see colors, causing issues in accurately judging subtle differences. Understanding how different color models align with human visual perception is crucial for various applications in image processing, digital media, and design.