Wallcamera: Reinventing the Wheel?
This is an incremental improvement for forensic analysis, clarifying prior claims about the Wallcamera's novelty.
The paper argues that the Wallcamera's key insight is not novel, as it was previously demonstrated by differential imaging forensics (DIF), but it achieves activity recognition at a finer granularity than DIF.
Developed at MIT CSAIL, the Wallcamera has captivated the public's imagination. Here, we show that the key insight underlying the Wallcamera is the same one that underpins the concept and the prototype of differential imaging forensics (DIF), both of which were validated and reported several years prior to the Wallcamera's debut. Rather than being the first to extract and amplify invisible signals -- aka latent evidence in the forensics context -- from wall reflections in a video, or the first to propose activity recognition following that approach, the Wallcamera's actual innovation is achieving activity recognition at a finer granularity than DIF demonstrated. In addition to activity recognition, DIF as conceived has a number of other applications in forensics, including 1) the recovery of a photographer's personal identifiable information such as body width, height, and even the color of their clothing, from a single photo, and 2) the detection of image tampering and deepfake videos.