Assessing Graphical Perception of Image Embedding Models using Channel Effectiveness
This work addresses the need for better evaluation of vision models' graphical perception for chart comprehension, though it is incremental as it builds on existing embedding methods.
The paper tackles the problem of assessing how vision models process charts by introducing an evaluation framework that measures channel effectiveness (accuracy and discriminability) of image embeddings. Experiments with CLIP show it perceives channel accuracy differently from humans and has unique discriminability in channels like length, tilt, and curvature.
Recent advancements in vision models have greatly improved their ability to handle complex chart understanding tasks, like chart captioning and question answering. However, it remains challenging to assess how these models process charts. Existing benchmarks only roughly evaluate model performance without evaluating the underlying mechanisms, such as how models extract image embeddings. This limits our understanding of the model's ability to perceive fundamental graphical components. To address this, we introduce a novel evaluation framework to assess the graphical perception of image embedding models. For chart comprehension, we examine two main aspects of channel effectiveness: accuracy and discriminability of various visual channels. Channel accuracy is assessed through the linearity of embeddings, measuring how well the perceived magnitude aligns with the size of the stimulus. Discriminability is evaluated based on the distances between embeddings, indicating their distinctness. Our experiments with the CLIP model show that it perceives channel accuracy differently from humans and shows unique discriminability in channels like length, tilt, and curvature. We aim to develop this work into a broader benchmark for reliable visual encoders, enhancing models for precise chart comprehension and human-like perception in future applications.