Strategic Chain-of-Thought: Guiding Accurate Reasoning in LLMs through Strategy Elicitation
This addresses the problem of inconsistent reasoning quality in LLMs for complex tasks, representing a novel method for a known bottleneck.
The paper tackled the instability of Chain-of-Thought methods in large language models by proposing Strategic Chain-of-Thought, which integrates strategic knowledge to guide reasoning, resulting in improvements such as a 21.05% increase on GSM8K and 24.13% on Tracking_Objects datasets.
The Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm has emerged as a critical approach for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, despite their widespread adoption and success, CoT methods often exhibit instability due to their inability to consistently ensure the quality of generated reasoning paths, leading to sub-optimal reasoning performance. To address this challenge, we propose the \textbf{Strategic Chain-of-Thought} (SCoT), a novel methodology designed to refine LLM performance by integrating strategic knowledge prior to generating intermediate reasoning steps. SCoT employs a two-stage approach within a single prompt: first eliciting an effective problem-solving strategy, which is then used to guide the generation of high-quality CoT paths and final answers. Our experiments across eight challenging reasoning datasets demonstrate significant improvements, including a 21.05\% increase on the GSM8K dataset and 24.13\% on the Tracking\_Objects dataset, respectively, using the Llama3-8b model. Additionally, we extend the SCoT framework to develop a few-shot method with automatically matched demonstrations, yielding even stronger results. These findings underscore the efficacy of SCoT, highlighting its potential to substantially enhance LLM performance in complex reasoning tasks.