The Power of Second Chance: Personalized Submodular Maximization with Two Candidates
This addresses the need for personalization in submodular optimization for scenarios with multiple user types, though it appears incremental by extending existing methods to allow two candidates.
The paper tackles the problem of personalized submodular maximization by introducing a method to select two candidate solutions that maximize the sum of utilities across multiple user-specific functions, rather than using a single aggregate subset, and presents effective algorithms for this approach.
Most of existing studies on submodular maximization focus on selecting a subset of items that maximizes a \emph{single} submodular function. However, in many real-world scenarios, we might have multiple user-specific functions, each of which models the utility of a particular type of user. In these settings, our goal would be to choose a set of items that performs well across all the user-specific functions. One way to tackle this problem is to select a single subset that maximizes the sum of all of the user-specific functions. Although this aggregate approach is efficient in the sense that it avoids computation of sets for individual functions, it really misses the power of personalization - for it does not allow to choose different sets for different functions. In this paper, we introduce the problem of personalized submodular maximization with two candidate solutions. For any two candidate solutions, the utility of each user-specific function is defined as the better of these two candidates. Our objective is, therefore, to select the best set of two candidates that maximize the sum of utilities of all the user-specific functions. We have designed effective algorithms for this problem. We also discuss how our approach generalizes to multiple candidate solutions, increasing flexibility and personalization in our solution.