LGITMLSep 8, 2024

A General Framework for Clustering and Distribution Matching with Bandit Feedback

arXiv:2409.05072v28 citationsh-index: 5
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses a foundational problem in online learning and bandit theory, with potential applications in areas like recommendation systems and anomaly detection, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing methods like Track-and-Stop.

The paper tackles the problem of clustering and distribution matching with bandit feedback by developing a general framework for online learning of arm partitions, deriving a non-asymptotic lower bound on arm pulls, and proposing an algorithm that asymptotically matches this bound with a novel convergence analysis.

We develop a general framework for clustering and distribution matching problems with bandit feedback. We consider a $K$-armed bandit model where some subset of $K$ arms is partitioned into $M$ groups. Within each group, the random variable associated to each arm follows the same distribution on a finite alphabet. At each time step, the decision maker pulls an arm and observes its outcome from the random variable associated to that arm. Subsequent arm pulls depend on the history of arm pulls and their outcomes. The decision maker has no knowledge of the distributions of the arms or the underlying partitions. The task is to devise an online algorithm to learn the underlying partition of arms with the least number of arm pulls on average and with an error probability not exceeding a pre-determined value~$δ$. Several existing problems fall under our general framework, including finding $M$ pairs of arms, odd arm identification, and $N$-ary clustering of $K$ arms belong to our general framework. We derive a non-asymptotic lower bound on the average number of arm pulls for any online algorithm with an error probability not exceeding $δ$. Furthermore, we develop a computationally-efficient online algorithm based on the Track-and-Stop method and Frank--Wolfe algorithm, and show that the average number of arm pulls of our algorithm asymptotically matches that of the lower bound. Our refined analysis also uncovers a novel bound on the speed at which the average number of arm pulls of our algorithm converges to the fundamental limit as $δ$ vanishes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes