Can Vision Language Models Learn from Visual Demonstrations of Ambiguous Spatial Reasoning?
This addresses a limitation in adapting VLMs to new tasks for researchers and practitioners, though it is incremental as it builds on existing ICL methods.
The paper tackled the problem of whether vision-language models can learn novel visuospatial concepts from visual demonstrations, finding they often fail zero-shot and after finetuning, but curriculum learning with simpler data improved in-context learning performance.
Large vision-language models (VLMs) have become state-of-the-art for many computer vision tasks, with in-context learning (ICL) as a popular adaptation strategy for new ones. But can VLMs learn novel concepts purely from visual demonstrations, or are they limited to adapting to the output format of ICL examples? We propose a new benchmark we call Spatial Visual Ambiguity Tasks (SVAT) that challenges state-of-the-art VLMs to learn new visuospatial tasks in-context. We find that VLMs fail to do this zero-shot, and sometimes continue to fail after finetuning. However, adding simpler data to the training by curriculum learning leads to improved ICL performance.