DSCRJun 23

Fully Dynamic Graph Algorithms with Edge Differential Privacy

arXiv:2409.176236.53 citationsh-index: 29
Predicted impact top 65% in DS · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

It addresses the need for private graph analytics under fully dynamic updates, a challenging setting with limited prior work, providing both algorithms and hardness results.

This paper presents the first differentially private fully dynamic graph algorithms for triangle count, connected components, maximum matching, and degree histogram, with both upper and lower bounds on error. For item-level privacy, several algorithms match the lower bounds.

We study differentially private algorithms for analyzing graphs in the challenging setting of continual release with fully dynamic updates, where edges are inserted and deleted over time, and the algorithm is required to update the solution at every time step. Previous work has presented differentially private algorithms for many graph problems that can handle insertions only or deletions only (called partially dynamic algorithms) and obtained some hardness results for the fully dynamic setting. The only algorithms in the latter setting were for the edge count, given by Fichtenberger, Henzinger, and Ost (ESA 21), and for releasing the values of all graph cuts, given by Fichtenberger, Henzinger, and Upadhyay (ICML 23). We provide the first differentially private and fully dynamic graph algorithms for several other fundamental graph statistics (including the triangle count, the number of connected components, the size of the maximum matching, and the degree histogram), analyze their error and show strong lower bounds on the error for all algorithms in this setting. We study two variants of edge differential privacy for fully dynamic graph algorithms: event-level and item-level. We give upper and lower bounds on the error of both event-level and item-level fully dynamic algorithms for several fundamental graph problems. No fully dynamic algorithms that are private at the item-level (the more stringent of the two notions) were known before. In the case of item-level privacy, for several problems, our algorithms match our lower bounds.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes