CLOct 26, 2024

Ambiguity is the last thing you need

arXiv:2410.20222v1
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This is an incremental analysis for the legal sector, focusing on reducing ambiguity in contracts to avoid disputes.

The paper addresses the problem of ambiguous language in contracts, which leads to disputes and litigation, and argues that using plain language can minimize misinterpretation and prevent future legal issues.

Clear legal language forms the backbone of a contract for numerous reasons. Disputes often arise between contract parties where ambiguous language has been used and parties often disagree on the meaning or effect of the words. Unambiguous language can also be important where there is an imbalance of bargaining strength between the parties, for instance where a business is contracting with a consumer, where the law actually requires plain language to be used. Thus, plain language minimises misinterpretation and prevents future litigation. Contracts become ambiguous when the language used is vague, imprecise, or open to multiple interpretations and this is due to the vast number of synonyms in the English Language which creates differences in interpretation between the meaning of the language. Ambiguity has always formed a prevalent issue in case-law, with a large percentage of cases based on ambiguous language. Thus, from an outside perspective the legal sector should look forward to ways of reducing this.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes