Logic Error Localization in Student Programming Assignments Using Pseudocode and Graph Neural Networks
This addresses the challenge of detecting logic errors for students in introductory programming courses, offering a tool to improve coding proficiency, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods for error localization.
The paper tackles the problem of localizing logic errors in student programming assignments by using pseudocode and graph neural networks, achieving 99.2% accuracy in identifying erroneous lines within the top-10 suspected lines.
Pseudocode is extensively used in introductory programming courses to instruct computer science students in algorithm design, utilizing natural language to define algorithmic behaviors. This learning approach enables students to convert pseudocode into source code and execute it to verify their algorithms' correctness. This process typically introduces two types of errors: syntax errors and logic errors. Syntax errors are often accompanied by compiler feedback, which helps students identify incorrect lines. In contrast, logic errors are more challenging because they do not trigger compiler errors and lack immediate diagnostic feedback, making them harder to detect and correct. To address this challenge, we developed a system designed to localize logic errors within student programming assignments at the line level. Our approach utilizes pseudocode as a scaffold to build a code-pseudocode graph, connecting symbols from the source code to their pseudocode counterparts. We then employ a graph neural network to both localize and suggest corrections for logic errors. Additionally, we have devised a method to efficiently gather logic-error-prone programs during the syntax error correction process and compile these into a dataset that includes single and multiple line logic errors, complete with indices of the erroneous lines. Our experimental results are promising, demonstrating a localization accuracy of 99.2% for logic errors within the top-10 suspected lines, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing students' coding proficiency and error correction skills.