IVLGMLNov 2, 2024

The impact of MRI image quality on statistical and predictive analysis on voxel based morphology

arXiv:2411.01268v11 citationsh-index: 37
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This research addresses the problem of confounding effects from poor MRI image quality for neuroimaging researchers, providing incremental insights into quality control trade-offs between univariate and multivariate methods.

The study investigated how MRI image quality affects statistical and predictive analyses in voxel-based morphology, finding that low-quality data strongly reduces the detection of significant sex/gender differences in univariate tests, while sample size and quality have marginal effects on classification performance using logistic regression.

Image Quality of MRI brain scans is strongly influenced by within scanner head movements and the resulting image artifacts alter derived measures like brain volume and cortical thickness. Automated image quality assessment is key to controlling for confounding effects of poor image quality. In this study, we systematically test for the influence of image quality on univariate statistics and machine learning classification. We analyzed group effects of sex/gender on local brain volume and made predictions of sex/gender using logistic regression, while correcting for brain size. From three large publicly available datasets, two age and sex-balanced samples were derived to test the generalizability of the effect for pooled sample sizes of n=760 and n=1094. Results of the Bonferroni corrected t-tests over 3747 gray matter features showed a strong influence of low-quality data on the ability to find significant sex/gender differences for the smaller sample. Increasing sample size and more so image quality showed a stark increase in detecting significant effects in univariate group comparisons. For the classification of sex/gender using logistic regression, both increasing sample size and image quality had a marginal effect on the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for most datasets and subsamples. Our results suggest a more stringent quality control for univariate approaches than for multivariate classification with a leaning towards higher quality for classical group statistics and bigger sample sizes for machine learning applications in neuroimaging.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes