Unlocking the Theory Behind Scaling 1-Bit Neural Networks
This work addresses the problem of efficiency and performance in large-scale AI models for researchers and practitioners, providing foundational theoretical guarantees for 1-bit networks, though it builds incrementally on prior scaling law research.
The paper tackles the theoretical understanding of scaling laws for 1-bit neural networks, proving that as network width increases, these models converge to arbitrarily small loss and maintain negligible generalization differences compared to full-precision counterparts.
Recently, 1-bit Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged, showcasing an impressive combination of efficiency and performance that rivals traditional LLMs. Research by Wang et al. (2023); Ma et al. (2024) indicates that the performance of these 1-bit LLMs progressively improves as the number of parameters increases, hinting at the potential existence of a Scaling Law for 1-bit Neural Networks. In this paper, we present the first theoretical result that rigorously establishes this scaling law for 1-bit models. We prove that, despite the constraint of weights restricted to $\{-1, +1\}$, the dynamics of model training inevitably align with kernel behavior as the network width grows. This theoretical breakthrough guarantees convergence of the 1-bit model to an arbitrarily small loss as width increases. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of the generalization difference, defined as the gap between the outputs of 1-bit networks and their full-precision counterparts, and demonstrate that this difference maintains a negligible level as network width scales. Building on the work of Kaplan et al. (2020), we conclude by examining how the training loss scales as a power-law function of the model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized for training. Our findings underscore the promising potential of scaling 1-bit neural networks, suggesting that int1 could become the standard in future neural network precision.