Foundation Models for Rapid Autonomy Validation
This addresses the scalability problem for autonomous vehicle companies in safety validation, though it is incremental as it builds on existing simulation and foundation model techniques.
The paper tackles the challenge of validating autonomous vehicle safety by efficiently testing across all driving scenarios, including rare events, using a behavior foundation model to prioritize hard scenarios, resulting in more rapid estimation of collision rates and severity.
We are motivated by the problem of autonomous vehicle performance validation. A key challenge is that an autonomous vehicle requires testing in every kind of driving scenario it could encounter, including rare events, to provide a strong case for safety and show there is no edge-case pathological behavior. Autonomous vehicle companies rely on potentially millions of miles driven in realistic simulation to expose the driving stack to enough miles to estimate rates and severity of collisions. To address scalability and coverage, we propose the use of a behavior foundation model, specifically a masked autoencoder (MAE), trained to reconstruct driving scenarios. We leverage the foundation model in two complementary ways: we (i) use the learned embedding space to group qualitatively similar scenarios together and (ii) fine-tune the model to label scenario difficulty based on the likelihood of a collision upon simulation. We use the difficulty scoring as importance weighting for the groups of scenarios. The result is an approach which can more rapidly estimate the rates and severity of collisions by prioritizing hard scenarios while ensuring exposure to every kind of driving scenario.