Gaussian Smoothing in Saliency Maps: The Stability-Fidelity Trade-Off in Neural Network Interpretability
This addresses the reliability of neural network interpretability for researchers and practitioners, but it is incremental as it builds on existing methods like Smooth-Grad.
The paper tackles the instability of gradient-based saliency maps to training randomness and shows that Gaussian smoothing in Smooth-Grad boosts stability but reduces fidelity, with theoretical bounds and empirical validation on image datasets.
Saliency maps have been widely used to interpret the decisions of neural network classifiers and discover phenomena from their learned functions. However, standard gradient-based maps are frequently observed to be highly sensitive to the randomness of training data and the stochasticity in the training process. In this work, we study the role of Gaussian smoothing in the well-known Smooth-Grad algorithm in the stability of the gradient-based maps to the randomness of training samples. We extend the algorithmic stability framework to gradient-based interpretation maps and prove bounds on the stability error of standard Simple-Grad, Integrated-Gradients, and Smooth-Grad saliency maps. Our theoretical results suggest the role of Gaussian smoothing in boosting the stability of gradient-based maps to the randomness of training settings. On the other hand, we analyze the faithfulness of the Smooth-Grad maps to the original Simple-Grad and show the lower fidelity under a more intense Gaussian smoothing. We support our theoretical results by performing several numerical experiments on standard image datasets. Our empirical results confirm our hypothesis on the fidelity-stability trade-off in the application of Gaussian smoothing to gradient-based interpretation maps.