Knowledge Authoring with Factual English, Rules, and Actions
This work addresses the bottleneck of requiring specialized skills for knowledge engineering, making KRR systems more usable for domain experts.
The authors tackled the problem of making knowledge representation and reasoning systems more accessible by extending the KALM system to handle factual English sentences, rules, and actions, achieving correctness rates of 95% on fact/query authoring, 100% on rule authoring, and over 99.3% on actions, along with a 68% runtime improvement.
Knowledge representation and reasoning systems represent knowledge as collections of facts and rules. KRRs can represent complex concepts and relations, and they can query and manipulate information in sophisticated ways. Unfortunately, the KRR technology has been hindered by the fact that specifying the requisite knowledge requires skills that most domain experts do not have, and professional knowledge engineers are hard to find. Some recent CNL-based approaches, such as the Knowledge Authoring Logic Machine (KALM), have shown to have very high accuracy compared to others, and a natural question is to what extent the CNL restrictions can be lifted. Besides the CNL restrictions, KALM has limitations in terms of the types of knowledge it can represent. To address these issues, we propose an extension of KALM called KALM for Factual Language (KALMF). KALMF uses a neural parser for natural language, MS, to parse what we call factual English sentences, which require little grammar training to use. Building upon KALMF, we propose KALM for Rules and Actions (KALMR), to represent and reason with rules and actions. Furthermore, we identify the reasons behind the slow speed of KALM and make optimizations to address this issue. Our evaluation using multiple benchmarks shows that our approaches achieve a high level of correctness on fact and query authoring (95%) and on rule authoring (100%). When used for authoring and reasoning with actions, our approach achieves more than 99.3% correctness, demonstrating its effectiveness in enabling more sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning. We also illustrate the logical reasoning capabilities of our approach by drawing attention to the problems faced by the famous AI, ChatGPT. Finally, the evaluation of the newly proposed speed optimization points not only to a 68% runtime improvement but also yields better accuracy of the overall system.