AINov 10, 2024

A Review of Fairness and A Practical Guide to Selecting Context-Appropriate Fairness Metrics in Machine Learning

arXiv:2411.06624v36 citationsh-index: 39
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This provides a practical tool for policymakers, developers, and researchers to address fairness concerns and comply with regulations, but it is incremental as it builds on existing literature without introducing a new method.

The paper tackles the challenge of defining appropriate fairness measures in machine learning due to contextual complexities, by developing a flowchart based on twelve criteria to guide the selection of context-aware fairness metrics.

Recent regulatory proposals for artificial intelligence emphasize fairness requirements for machine learning models. However, precisely defining the appropriate measure of fairness is challenging due to philosophical, cultural and political contexts. Biases can infiltrate machine learning models in complex ways depending on the model's context, rendering a single common metric of fairness insufficient. This ambiguity highlights the need for criteria to guide the selection of context-aware measures, an issue of increasing importance given the proliferation of ever tighter regulatory requirements. To address this, we developed a flowchart to guide the selection of contextually appropriate fairness measures. Twelve criteria were used to formulate the flowchart. This included consideration of model assessment criteria, model selection criteria, and data bias. We also review fairness literature in the context of machine learning and link it to core regulatory instruments to assist policymakers, AI developers, researchers, and other stakeholders in appropriately addressing fairness concerns and complying with relevant regulatory requirements.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes