RadioActive: 3D Radiological Interactive Segmentation Benchmark
This addresses the need for reliable evaluation in clinical workflows for radiologists, though it is incremental as it builds on existing interactive segmentation approaches.
The paper tackles the problem of evaluating interactive segmentation methods in 3D radiology by introducing the RadioActive benchmark, which provides a rigorous framework and shows that SAM2 outperforms specialized medical models with minimal interactions.
Effortless and precise segmentation with minimal clinician effort could greatly streamline clinical workflows. Recent interactive segmentation models, inspired by METAs Segment Anything, have made significant progress but face critical limitations in 3D radiology. These include impractical human interaction requirements such as slice-by-slice operations for 2D models on 3D data and a lack of iterative refinement. Prior studies have been hindered by inadequate evaluation protocols, resulting in unreliable performance assessments and inconsistent findings across studies. The RadioActive benchmark addresses these challenges by providing a rigorous and reproducible evaluation framework for interactive segmentation methods in clinically relevant scenarios. It features diverse datasets, a wide range of target structures, and the most impactful 2D and 3D interactive segmentation methods, all within a flexible and extensible codebase. We also introduce advanced prompting techniques that reduce interaction steps, enabling fair comparisons between 2D and 3D models. Surprisingly, SAM2 outperforms all specialized medical 2D and 3D models in a setting requiring only a few interactions to generate prompts for a 3D volume. This challenges prevailing assumptions and demonstrates that general-purpose models surpass specialized medical approaches. By open-sourcing RadioActive, we invite researchers to integrate their models and prompting techniques, ensuring continuous and transparent evaluation of 3D medical interactive models.