Optimal Capacity Modification for Stable Matchings with Ties
For the stable matching community, this work provides algorithmic foundations for ensuring strong stability via capacity modifications, with both tractable and intractable variants.
The paper addresses the Hospitals/Residents problem with ties, aiming to minimally increase hospital quotas to guarantee a strongly stable matching. It provides a polynomial-time algorithm for minimizing total capacity increase (MINSUM) and shows that minimizing maximum increase (MINMAX) is NP-hard.
We consider the Hospitals/Residents (HR) problem in the presence of ties in hospital preferences. Among the three notions of stability, namely weak stability, strong stability, and super-stability, we focus on the notion of strong stability. Strong stability has many desirable properties, both theoretically and in practice; however, its existence is not guaranteed. In this paper, our objective is to optimally increase the quotas of hospitals to ensure that a strongly stable matching exists in the modified instance. We explore two natural optimization criteria: (i) minimizing the total capacity increase across all hospitals (MINSUM) and (ii) minimizing the maximum capacity increase for any hospital (MINMAX). We show that the MINSUM problem admits a polynomial-time algorithm. We also establish an analog of the well-known rural hospitals theorem [Gale & Sotomayor, 1985; Roth, 1986], adapted to the MINSUM augmentation setting. We consider a generalization of the MINSUM problem in which each hospital incurs a cost per unit increase in its quota. We show that the cost version of the MINSUM problem is NP-hard and inapproximable within any multiplicative factor, even if the costs are zero or one. For the MINSUM objective with a set of forced edges, we give a polynomial-time algorithm. In contrast to the above results for the MINSUM problem, we show that the MINMAX problem is NP-hard. When hospital preference lists have ties of length at most $\ell+1$, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that increases each hospital's quota by at most $\ell$, ensuring the resulting instance admits a strongly stable matching. Moreover, among all such augmentations, our algorithm outputs the best strongly stable matching from the residents' perspective.