CLAILGNov 29, 2024

Reverse Thinking Makes LLMs Stronger Reasoners

arXiv:2411.19865v228 citationsh-index: 23NAACL
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses reasoning limitations in LLMs for tasks like commonsense, math, and logic, offering a novel approach with significant performance gains, though it is incremental in building on existing knowledge distillation methods.

The paper tackles the problem of enhancing reasoning in Large Language Models by introducing Reverse-Enhanced Thinking (RevThink), a framework that uses data augmentation and multi-task learning to enable reverse thinking, resulting in an average 13.53% improvement over zero-shot performance and 6.84% over strong baselines across 12 datasets.

Reverse thinking plays a crucial role in human reasoning. Humans can reason not only from a problem to a solution but also in reverse, i.e., start from the solution and reason towards the problem. This often enhances overall reasoning performance as it enables consistency checks between their forward and backward thinking. To enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform reverse thinking, we introduce Reverse-Enhanced Thinking (RevThink), a framework composed of data augmentation and learning objectives. In RevThink, we augment the dataset by collecting structured forward-backward reasoning from a teacher model, consisting of: (1) the original question, (2) forward reasoning, (3) backward question, and (4) backward reasoning. We then employ three objectives to train a smaller student model in a multi-task learning fashion: (a) generate forward reasoning from a question, (b) generate a backward question from a question, and (c) generate backward reasoning from the backward question. Experiments across 12 datasets covering commonsense, math, and logical reasoning show an average 13.53% improvement over the student model's zero-shot performance and a 6.84% improvement over the strongest knowledge distillation baselines. Moreover, our method demonstrates sample efficiency -- using only 10% of the correct forward reasoning from the training data, it outperforms a standard fine-tuning method trained on 10x more forward reasoning. RevThink also exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution held-out datasets.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes