CLAIDec 20, 2024

HREF: Human Response-Guided Evaluation of Instruction Following in Language Models

arXiv:2412.15524v27 citationsh-index: 28
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses evaluation biases for researchers and practitioners using LLMs, offering an incremental improvement by integrating human responses into automatic assessments.

The paper tackles the problem of bias in automatic evaluation of instruction-following in LLMs by leveraging human-written responses, resulting in up to a 3.2% improvement in agreement with human judges. It introduces the HREF benchmark with 4,258 samples across 11 task categories to provide reliable and contamination-free evaluation.

Evaluating the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in following instructions has heavily relied on a powerful LLM as the judge, introducing unresolved biases that deviate the judgments from human judges. In this work, we reevaluate various choices for automatic evaluation on a wide range of instruction-following tasks. We experiment with methods that leverage human-written responses and observe that they enhance the reliability of automatic evaluations across a wide range of tasks, resulting in up to a 3.2% improvement in agreement with human judges. We also discovered that human-written responses offer an orthogonal perspective to model-generated responses in following instructions and should be used as an additional context when comparing model responses. Based on these observations, we develop a new evaluation benchmark, Human Response-Guided Evaluation of Instruction Following (HREF), comprising 4,258 samples across 11 task categories with a composite evaluation setup, employing a composite evaluation setup that selects the most reliable method for each category. In addition to providing reliable evaluation, HREF emphasizes individual task performance and is free from contamination. Finally, we study the impact of key design choices in HREF, including the size of the evaluation set, the judge model, the baseline model, and the prompt template. We host a live leaderboard that evaluates LLMs on the private evaluation set of HREF.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes