Are GNNs Actually Effective for Multimodal Fault Diagnosis in Microservice Systems?
This work challenges the necessity of graph structures in fault diagnosis for microservice systems, advocating for re-evaluation of architectural complexity and standardized baselines.
The paper tackled the problem of evaluating the effectiveness of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for multimodal fault diagnosis in microservice systems, finding that a minimal, topology-agnostic baseline (DiagMLP) achieved performance parity with state-of-the-art GNN-based methods across five datasets.
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely adopted for fault diagnosis in microservice systems, premised on their ability to model service dependencies. However, the necessity of explicit graph structures remains underexamined, as existing evaluations conflate preprocessing with architectural contributions. To isolate the true value of GNNs, we propose DiagMLP, a deliberately minimal, topology-agnostic baseline that retains multimodal fusion capabilities while excluding graph modeling. Through ablation experiments across five datasets, DiagMLP achieves performance parity with state-of-the-art GNN-based methods in fault detection, localization, and classification. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that graph structures are indispensable, revealing that: (i) preprocessing pipelines already encode critical dependency information, and (ii) GNN modules contribute marginally beyond multimodality fusion. Our work advocates for systematic re-evaluation of architectural complexity and highlights the need for standardized baseline protocols to validate model innovations.