Large Language Models For Text Classification: Case Study And Comprehensive Review
This work provides practical insights for practitioners on the trade-offs between LLMs and traditional methods in text classification, though it is incremental as it applies existing models to new datasets.
The study evaluated Large Language Models (LLMs) against traditional machine learning models for text classification tasks, finding that LLMs like Llama3 and GPT-4 outperform in complex multiclass classification but with longer inference times, while simpler models are more efficient for binary classification.
Unlocking the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in data classification represents a promising frontier in natural language processing. In this work, we evaluate the performance of different LLMs in comparison with state-of-the-art deep-learning and machine-learning models, in two different classification scenarios: i) the classification of employees' working locations based on job reviews posted online (multiclass classification), and 2) the classification of news articles as fake or not (binary classification). Our analysis encompasses a diverse range of language models differentiating in size, quantization, and architecture. We explore the impact of alternative prompting techniques and evaluate the models based on the weighted F1-score. Also, we examine the trade-off between performance (F1-score) and time (inference response time) for each language model to provide a more nuanced understanding of each model's practical applicability. Our work reveals significant variations in model responses based on the prompting strategies. We find that LLMs, particularly Llama3 and GPT-4, can outperform traditional methods in complex classification tasks, such as multiclass classification, though at the cost of longer inference times. In contrast, simpler ML models offer better performance-to-time trade-offs in simpler binary classification tasks.