LGAICLCVJan 24, 2025

Internal Activation Revision: Safeguarding Vision Language Models Without Parameter Update

arXiv:2501.16378v115 citationsh-index: 9AAAI
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses a safety vulnerability in VLMs for users relying on multimodal AI systems, representing a domain-specific incremental improvement.

The paper tackles the problem of vision-language models (VLMs) being more susceptible to generating harmful content due to activation shifts from image integration, and it proposes an internal activation revision method that reduces attack success rates by an average of 34.34% to 52.98% across benchmarks while minimally affecting helpfulness.

Vision-language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong multimodal capabilities but have been found to be more susceptible to generating harmful content compared to their backbone large language models (LLMs). Our investigation reveals that the integration of images significantly shifts the model's internal activations during the forward pass, diverging from those triggered by textual input. Moreover, the safety alignments of LLMs embedded within VLMs are not sufficiently robust to handle the activations discrepancies, making the models vulnerable to even the simplest jailbreaking attacks. To address this issue, we propose an \textbf{internal activation revision} approach that efficiently revises activations during generation, steering the model toward safer outputs. Our framework incorporates revisions at both the layer and head levels, offering control over the model's generation at varying levels of granularity. In addition, we explore three strategies for constructing positive and negative samples and two approaches for extracting revision vectors, resulting in different variants of our method. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the internal activation revision method significantly improves the safety of widely used VLMs, reducing attack success rates by an average of 48.94\%, 34.34\%, 43.92\%, and 52.98\% on SafeBench, Safe-Unsafe, Unsafe, and MM-SafetyBench, respectively, while minimally impacting model helpfulness.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes