From Public Square to Echo Chamber: The Fragmentation of Online Discourse
It addresses the problem of online polarization and erosion of collective reasoning for society, offering a nuanced understanding by integrating philosophical perspectives with computational analysis, but it is incremental as it builds on existing research on social media effects.
This paper investigates how social media algorithms and filter bubbles fragment online discourse, exacerbating ideological divides and undermining shared understanding, particularly during societal tensions, by analyzing digital community dynamics and revealing mechanisms that drive polarization and restrict cross-group dialogue.
This paper examines how social media algorithms and filter bubbles contribute to the fragmentation of online discourse, fostering ideological divides and undermining shared understanding. Drawing on Michael Sandels philosophical emphasis on community and shared values, the study explores how digital platforms amplify discrimination discourse including sexism, racism, xenophobia, ableism, homophobia, and religious intolerance during periods of heightened societal tension. By analyzing the dynamics of digital communities, the research highlights mechanisms driving the emergence and evolution of discourse fragments in response to real world events. The findings reveal how social media structures exacerbate polarization, restrict cross group dialogue, and erode the collective reasoning essential for a just society. This study situates philosophical perspectives within a computational analysis of social media interactions, offering a nuanced understanding of the challenges posed by fragmented discourse in the digital age.