CRCVFeb 11, 2025

RoMA: Robust Malware Attribution via Byte-level Adversarial Training with Global Perturbations and Adversarial Consistency Regularization

arXiv:2502.07492v24 citationsh-index: 10
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses a critical cybersecurity problem for threat intelligence analysts by significantly enhancing the robustness of malware attribution models against adversarial evasion.

The paper tackles the problem of attributing APT malware to specific groups, which is crucial for cybersecurity but vulnerable to adversarial attacks, by proposing RoMA, a novel adversarial training approach that achieves over 80% robust accuracy under PGD attacks—more than twice that of the next-best method—while also improving training efficiency.

Attributing APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) malware to their respective groups is crucial for threat intelligence and cybersecurity. However, APT adversaries often conceal their identities, rendering attribution inherently adversarial. Existing machine learning-based attribution models, while effective, remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. For example, the state-of-the-art byte-level model MalConv sees its accuracy drop from over 90% to below 2% under PGD (projected gradient descent) attacks. Existing gradient-based adversarial training techniques for malware detection or image processing were applied to malware attribution in this study, revealing that both robustness and training efficiency require significant improvement. To address this, we propose RoMA, a novel single-step adversarial training approach that integrates global perturbations to generate enhanced adversarial samples and employs adversarial consistency regularization to improve representation quality and resilience. A novel APT malware dataset named AMG18, with diverse samples and realistic class imbalances, is introduced for evaluation. Extensive experiments show that RoMA significantly outperforms seven competing methods in both adversarial robustness (e.g., achieving over 80% robust accuracy-more than twice that of the next-best method under PGD attacks) and training efficiency (e.g., more than twice as fast as the second-best method in terms of accuracy), while maintaining superior standard accuracy in non-adversarial scenarios.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes